The school closure debate

Ok, so I know I haven't posted a real blog post in a very long time.  And I'm not going to promise that I'll do it more regularly, because I seem to go in spurts, but today, I have something I need to get off my chest, and 140 characters just won't do.
There has been much debate in recent weeks about school closures.  It is, obviously, a very sensitive subject for many people. Quite frankly, I do not have kids, nor do I live near a school that is marked for closure.  That also means I am not affected by the handful of new schools that are being built and opening soon.  But I cannot escape getting involved in this debate, because it's been everywhere.  Closing schools is a terrible situation, and I really, really hope the school board makes the right decision, but there is so much more to this situation than is really even known by anyone, including me.  It does not help that there have basically been propganda campaigns by both sides, and that both of those campaigns are filled with misinformation and trying to make the other side look bad.  It's like an election, just on a significantly smaller scale.

There are really 3 sides to this issue. The school board, people near the schools that are closing, and people near the schools that are opening.  Each have their own agendas, and none of them are compatible.  There is simply no way to make everyone happy, and it will probably make it more difficult for everyone.

The school board is faced with a simple reality.  A school that is designed to hold 500 students, but only has 100 enrolled, is simply not sustainable.  The amount of funding a school gets is based on the number of students it has, and the math is simple.  A school takes a fixed amount of money to run per year. Electricity, heating, maintenance costs, etc, all come out of the school's budget.  Many people argue that schools that are filled to capacity still dont' have enough funds for the classroom, how do you expect a school that's spending almost their entire budget on keeping the building running to survive?  It's a grim reality, but it's reality nevertheless.  It simply is not possible to run a school with such low enrollment.

The families that live near these schools are clearly devastated by the possibility that the schools will be closed.  And they should be.  I cannot imagine what that would have done to me if the school that I was going to closed while I was still going there.  It is truly truly sad that these people have to go through this, and I do not blame them at all for fighting to keep the schools open, I would be doing the exact same thing.  I just fear that the numbers are not on their side.

The third, and least talked about group, are people living in the suburbs of the city, and demanding schools be built to accommodate them.  This is more an issue of urban sprawl, which an entire different topic in itself, and one I won't get into as much in this post.  But the most common argument I have heard from people living in the newest neighbourhoods is that they don't want their kids busing for an hour a day to get to school.  I will say, that's a very vaild argument.  When I was growing up, I lived no more than a 10 minute walk away from my elementry and jr. high schools, and a 30 minute walk from my high school.  It would have sucked to have to take the bus for a couple of hours a day.  Of that there is no doubt.  And I can see why these people would like schools to be closer to them.  The problem is that most of the people who are moving into these neighbourhoods are younger people who are just starting families.  In my opinion, if thse people want to start a family and live close to a school, then they should be moving to a neighbourhood that is actually near a school, not moving as far away from the city core as they can, and then demanding the city and province spend tens of millions of dollars to build a school for you.  I totally get that they want to live in a newer neighbourhood, and many want to live in their dream house, but sometimes you can't have it both ways.  This is a huge reason why schools near the center of the city have low enrollment.  People are not willing to move into these neighbourhoods and there are fewer families there.  I know that this is not something that the people who love outside the center of the city are trying to do, but the fact that they chose to live so far away from existing schools is in many ways directly responsible for the difficulty that the school board faces now.  Again, this is more of a urban sprawl debate, and that is a massive problem in the city, but that isn't what I want to get into here.
Either way, the Edmonton Public School Board faces an impossible decision today.  Closing schools is never the first option, and I know that they will look at every option and do whatever they can to keep those schools open, as having schools in the center of the city is very important, but at the end of the day, the numbers simply might not support it.  Tomorrow morning, there will be very few happy people, and many angry people will be featured on the news.  I just hope that people remember that the end of the day, the school board is doing the best job it can with the situation it has been given, both directly and indirectly, by the public.



EAVB_DXKFNSFMTP

What a Storm

Last saturday an absolutely wicked storm blew through the Edmonton area. It was truly one of the most damaging storms I have ever seen. It was matched only by the massive storm that caused flooding few years ago. And while there was little to no rotation in the clouds, to many, the storm reminded them of Black Friday, when a Tornado touched down in the city in 1987.

The Clouds were easily the darkest I have ever seen. I had a wonderful view of the storm. I was over at a friend's condo that night. He lives in the river valley on the 7th floor of a condo building. He has a beautiful view of the river valley from which we could see the storm. The lightning was intense, and the wind was fierce. On the 7th floor balcony it was quite intense. I could feel the wind pushing me. I could see large tree limbs being pushed across the parking lots like they were pieces of paper. The first front passed by quickly.

The second front, about 45 minutes later, was not quite as windy, but it brought the rain. Easily the hardest rain I have seen in years. It came down very hard, very fast, and very large drops. Even with the patio doors closed while we were inside, we could hear the rain. That lasted for about 30 minutes. We never lost power there, but the lights flickered numerous times. While I was driving home, large portions of my trip home were dark, and without power. When I got home, it was obvious that the power had been out, probably for about 3 hours, and had just recently come on.

I did not take any really good pictures, however, many edmontonians did. Linked is the photo gallery from iNews880 of the damage that was done. Thousands of trees were destroyed, buildings damaged, the pictures really are amazing.

Once again, Twitter played a large role in this storm. There were many, many tweets during, and after the storm, pictures being relayed in real time, and first hand accounts being displayed in real time, as it was happening. This allowed coverage of the storm that simply would not have happened in the past, and is truly amazing. Also linked is Mack Male's blog where he talks more in depth about social media than I would. It's a must read.

[Read] - iNews880

[Read] - Mack Male's blog

Last.FM no longer free if you do not live in US, U.K., or Germany

Wired.com has an article about Last.fm making the site a pay site outside of the US, U.K. and Germany.  According to the article, last.fm is saying they do not gain enough advertising revenue from these countries to justify the cost of the service.  From now on, users outside of those 3 countries will have to pay $3/month to use the service, not a large amount of money, but $3 more than it was before.  It also pretty much means that minors will have no way to use the service, unless they are able to use a parent’s credit card.  Last.fm has always had this $3/month service, but before it was a “premium” account that removes advertising and offers more playlist flexibility.

I think this is ridiculous.  I am a last.fm user, not all the time, but probably 3-4 hours a week of the service.  I will no longer be using that service.  Can I afford $3/month?  Absolutely.  Will I pay it?  Absolutely not.  I feel like the people that use last.fm outside of those 3 “core” countries will be forced to finance last.fm’s continued operations in those countries, where people listen for free.

I have also introduced a few people under the age of 18 to last.fm, and at least a couple of them use it as their primary music source at home now.  I now have to go tell them they can’t keep using their favorite service, unless they can manage to convince their parents to allow the use of their credit card.  This will likely just drive minors back to piracy, when they before had a legal means of listening to music.  And I think we can all agree that driving people back to piracy, when they were previously more than willing to listen to ads to get their media in a legal manner.

It may not seem like it, but Last.fm has just taken a step back in combating piracy, and that is a bad thing

[Read] – Wired aticle

Twitter and the media

Yesterday Lynda Steele of Global TV Edmonton posted to Twitter asking for suggestions on how the media can effectively use Twitter, and asked for anyone to email her with suggestions to take to a newsroom meeting today.  This, along with the recent rush of Edmonton media flocking to Twitter really got me thinking about Twitter, Media, and the news in general.  I spent some time thinking about it, and did send her my thoughts.  I thought that I would put some of them down here.

Twitter is about the community. specifically in Edmonton there are people from all walks of life, from every corner of the city, and even the entire Capital Region that use Twitter.  that is a powerful tool that, if used correctly, can greatly enhance the media.  I personally believe that the key to using Twitter is not to simply use it as another medium for delivering the same news, but to make it actually part of the news process.  Currently, Global TV Edmonton uses Facebook effectively in that many news updates and clips are posted there, as well as user feedback on the fan page being read on the air.  However, Facebook does not have the same instant connection feeling that Twitter has.  Facebook is a good tool, and I hope that Global can continue to develop it as a tool and exploit it’s strengths to enhance the quality of their broadcasts.  I think they can do the exact same thing with Twitter, however in a different way.

My main suggestion to Ms. Steele was to exploit the Twitter community as much as possible.  Use Twitter not just as a tool for delivering the news, but use it in the information gathering process, use it in the reporting process, and use it in the dissemination of the news.  Make the Twitter community an active participant in the news.  There is such a diverse group on Twitter that is ready, willing, and able to be used.  Some of the specific suggestions I had were:

  • Use twitter to ask for quick, immediate feedback on a story
  • Use Twitter to have users submit interview questions
  • Utilize the fact that there are people from the entire Capital Region on Twitter by monitoring what is going on in the city
  • Find News stories on Twitter
    • If a user posts something interesting on Twitter, have a reporter investigate.  Ask questions to see what is going on.  Maybe a simple 140 character post can turn into the top story of the day.
    • If a user on Twitter sees news happen, use that person who is there as it is happening in gathering information on a story.
  • Make Twitter an active part of the news broadcasts.  Reaction to a news story can be gauged even before the story is over on the broadcasts.  make the comments part of the story.

What I don't want to see is Twitter simply being used like RSS.  Twitter is a powerful tool that connects people together unlike Facebook likely ever will.  It should be used, and exploited to improve the quality of the news, and the quality of the media.  I believe that, if used properly, Twitter can be a tool to improve the quality of the product that the Media delivers.  I cannot wait to see what Lynda Steele and the rest of the Global TV Edmonton team can come up with.  As someone who has been using Twitter since November of 2007 it is very exciting to me to see how much it has grown.  I think the media can further it’s growth even more.