Last.FM no longer free if you do not live in US, U.K., or Germany

Wired.com has an article about Last.fm making the site a pay site outside of the US, U.K. and Germany.  According to the article, last.fm is saying they do not gain enough advertising revenue from these countries to justify the cost of the service.  From now on, users outside of those 3 countries will have to pay $3/month to use the service, not a large amount of money, but $3 more than it was before.  It also pretty much means that minors will have no way to use the service, unless they are able to use a parent’s credit card.  Last.fm has always had this $3/month service, but before it was a “premium” account that removes advertising and offers more playlist flexibility.

I think this is ridiculous.  I am a last.fm user, not all the time, but probably 3-4 hours a week of the service.  I will no longer be using that service.  Can I afford $3/month?  Absolutely.  Will I pay it?  Absolutely not.  I feel like the people that use last.fm outside of those 3 “core” countries will be forced to finance last.fm’s continued operations in those countries, where people listen for free.

I have also introduced a few people under the age of 18 to last.fm, and at least a couple of them use it as their primary music source at home now.  I now have to go tell them they can’t keep using their favorite service, unless they can manage to convince their parents to allow the use of their credit card.  This will likely just drive minors back to piracy, when they before had a legal means of listening to music.  And I think we can all agree that driving people back to piracy, when they were previously more than willing to listen to ads to get their media in a legal manner.

It may not seem like it, but Last.fm has just taken a step back in combating piracy, and that is a bad thing

[Read] – Wired aticle

Why the CRTC needs an overhaul – Part 2

This is the second part of my post/rant about the CRTC.  You can find part one here.

In part one I briefly talked about the protectionism the CRTC takes with regards to Canadian content.  I want to talk a bit about how the CRTC handles TV, and how it is really limiting how Canadians can get TV shows legally through new media sources, namely the internet.

I am going to start by explaining where the United States stands in online media.  It’s a fairly simple process in the US.  Fox produces the show 24, and they have full rights to that show to distribute it however they want.  24 can be watched on regular TV, it can be purchased on the iTunes store, and it can be legally watched online on various websites, most notably hulu.  Through all of these, Fox collects a royalty.  It collects a percentage of the sales on iTunes, as well as revenue from advertisements on both the broadcast TV and web versions.  The streaming web versions have advertisements just like the broadcast TV does.  in the year since hulu launched, it has exploded in popularity.  The people that visit the site do not care that there are ads in the shows.  they appreciate that they can watch the shows online, and are more than willing to sit through normal ads.  This model is proving very successful, and more and more shows are appearing on the web in either a paid downloadable form, or an ad-supported streaming fashion.

Now, lets move over to the Canadian logistics. In Canada, Global TV has paid for the right to show 24 on it’s network.  This means that Global has full rights to the show in Canada.  Under CRTC rules, Global simulcasts 24 fox in the US, except that the fox channel in Canada is dubbed over the the Global broadcast.  This means that the Fox broadcast is not seen at all in Canada.  This is to ensure that all ads shown on TV are the Canadian ads.  This I have no problem with(except for the super bowl of course.  I want those US ads).  where it gets muddy is the online space.  I will use the iTunes store and 24 as an example. 

Since Global owns the rights to 24 in Canada, it also owns the rights for all online broadcasts of the show as well.  for Apple to offer 24 on the iTunes store in Canada, they have to negotiate a deal with Fox, as it is the owner of the show as a whole.  Then, because Global owns the broadcast rights in Canada, Apple essentially has to negotiate the same deal again with Global.  this means that while Apple only has to negotiate one deal to offer 24 in the US, it has to negotiate 2 deals to offer 24 in Canada.  This means that they will have to pay fees to both Fox and Global, which, if any such deal can even be done, will likely mean that extra cost being passed onto the consumer who buys the show.  Apple has been reluctant to this point to have to pass that cost onto the consumer, so those deals have not been made.  To be fair, Global does offer it’s shows streaming on it’s website.  However, as of this writing, they have chosen not to allow other methods of streaming either through them, or through sub-licensing their rights to the show.

If you look on the iTunes store in Canada, there is a lot of Canadian content, as well as some US content.  Canadian content can be negotiated the same way the US content is in the US. if CBC produces a show, they own all the rights, so Apple only has to negotiate one deal to get the show on iTunes.  there are also several US networks and shows in Canada.  Those are shows that do not have a Canadian rights owner.  Meaning that there are no Canadian networks that broadcast them.  In that case Apple again only has to negotiate one deal for those shows, as there is no one who holds the rights to broadcast the shows in Canada.

What I would like to see the CRTC do is begin removing the online component of the Canadian network’s license to show US shows in Canada.  If they want those rights, they should have to negotiate them separately.  This would allow proper competition in the marketplace, instead of a monopoly of the Canadian networks over US content.  Let’s un-do the shackles, and let people actually innovate with TV delivery on the internet.  It’s the way of the future, and if the CRTC chooses not to allow this to happen, they risk having the country left behind as others innovate.

Why the CRTC needs an overhaul – Part 1

The title says it all doesn’t it?  the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission(CRTC) is broken, and needs to be fixed.  the problem is, is that I’m not sure if it can be.  For those of you who don’t know, the CRTC is the governing body of all radio, TV, telephone, cell phone, and internet traffic in Canada.  The closest to an equal organization in the US would be the FCC, except that the CRTC also controls some things that the RIAA and MPAA in the US controls also.  Sounds great doesn’t it?  This post will truly be a wall of text, so I have decided to break it up into two parts.  The first part will deal with the current hearings going on between the RIAA and Canadian ISP’s regarding the internet.  The second part will be about the CRTC and TV in Canada.  I hope you’ll find it an interesting read.

For those who do not know, the CRTC requires that all TV and Radio stations based in Canada show a certain amount of Canadian content every day.  Canadian content is content that is shot and produced in Canada.  Some stations, like Global and CTV, usually only supply the minimum amount of Canadian content as required by the CRTC, where stations like CBC usually produce a higher level of Canadian content.  To this point, the CRTC has said that the internet is exempt from this rule.  The CRTC is now revisiting this exemption, and is weighing whether or not to require that a set amount of traffic delivered to Canadian PC’s would be Canadian content.

Let me just step back and let that sink in for a second.  Seriously, really sit and think about that.  Okay, done?  Good.

My first, gut response, is that the CRTC has no idea at all what it is doing, or talking about.  Contrary to belief from some US senators, the internet is not a “series of tubes.”  It is an open world and restricting it is next to impossible. 

It is possible to use IP address sources to find which content is coming from a Canadian PC or server, but that would in no way be accurate at all.  A Canadian could be using a US based hosting service, so the content could be Canadian, but coming from the US.  A US customer could be routing content through a proxy server in Canada, which would make the content look like it was coming from Canada, when it really is US produced.

Then lets look at the other side.  How are ISP’s supposed to enforce this?  The current number being thrown around is that 30% of internet content would have to be Canadian made content.  Never mind trying to throttle P2P traffic, what is an ISP supposed to do?  Suppose that there is a way to correctly tag all Canadian content on the internet.  In a scenario where 30% of all content viewed would have to be Canadian, what happens if that quota is not met?  Will ISP’s block all non Canadian web pages until over 30% of the content for the day is Canadian?  Will they cut you off of the internet all together?  Think of it this way.  After literally a decade of fighting, illegally downloading music, TV shows and movies is absolutely rampant across the internet.  If no one can stop illegal copyright violation, how are Canadian ISP's supposed to stop legal content from flowing?

I believe that this is one of the few times that every major ISP in the country, Shaw, Bell, Telus, and Rogers, have all agreed on one thing.  This would be a very bad idea.  Shaw was the first to voice it’s concerns, while the other three followed suit shortly thereafter.  It’s a kind of ISP solidarity that is unprecedented in this country.  They have realized that enforcing this would be impossible, and are telling the CRTC this.  The question is, will the CRTC listen?

Attempting to restrict the content on the internet would be catastrophic to the growth of the internet in Canada.  In a country this size, with such a small, spread out population, the internet has really changed the way that smaller communities, especially northern communities, can communicate. 

To me, this really shows how badly out of touch, and out of date the CRTC really is.  It is an organization that exists solely to protected Canadian interests.  I will never dispute that that is an important function, but in the age where I can find out exactly what is going on half way around the world in real time, the kind of protectionism that the CRTC undertakes is not realistic.  Instead of trying to fight the internet, the CRTC should be aiming to give everyone more access, and easier access to it. And instead of forcing Canadian content down peoples throats, they should be working with Canadian content providers to make good quality Canadian content that people will actually want to watch.  Don’t force the bad on us, but promote the good.  Make it good, and the people will watch.  Two of my favorite TV shows right now are The Border and Flashpoint, made by CBC and CTV respectively.  Both are action  shows, and both are, in my opinion, among the best shows on TV in their Genre right now, in the US or Canada.  CBS in the US has even bought the broadcast rights of Flashpoint from CTV and simulcasts new episodes when they air.

Is it too much to ask for the CRTC to stop trying to force decades old ideals down our throats?  I hope not.  And I hope they get the picture.  the CRTC needs to leave the internet alone.  I hope they are listening.

Twitter and the media

Yesterday Lynda Steele of Global TV Edmonton posted to Twitter asking for suggestions on how the media can effectively use Twitter, and asked for anyone to email her with suggestions to take to a newsroom meeting today.  This, along with the recent rush of Edmonton media flocking to Twitter really got me thinking about Twitter, Media, and the news in general.  I spent some time thinking about it, and did send her my thoughts.  I thought that I would put some of them down here.

Twitter is about the community. specifically in Edmonton there are people from all walks of life, from every corner of the city, and even the entire Capital Region that use Twitter.  that is a powerful tool that, if used correctly, can greatly enhance the media.  I personally believe that the key to using Twitter is not to simply use it as another medium for delivering the same news, but to make it actually part of the news process.  Currently, Global TV Edmonton uses Facebook effectively in that many news updates and clips are posted there, as well as user feedback on the fan page being read on the air.  However, Facebook does not have the same instant connection feeling that Twitter has.  Facebook is a good tool, and I hope that Global can continue to develop it as a tool and exploit it’s strengths to enhance the quality of their broadcasts.  I think they can do the exact same thing with Twitter, however in a different way.

My main suggestion to Ms. Steele was to exploit the Twitter community as much as possible.  Use Twitter not just as a tool for delivering the news, but use it in the information gathering process, use it in the reporting process, and use it in the dissemination of the news.  Make the Twitter community an active participant in the news.  There is such a diverse group on Twitter that is ready, willing, and able to be used.  Some of the specific suggestions I had were:

  • Use twitter to ask for quick, immediate feedback on a story
  • Use Twitter to have users submit interview questions
  • Utilize the fact that there are people from the entire Capital Region on Twitter by monitoring what is going on in the city
  • Find News stories on Twitter
    • If a user posts something interesting on Twitter, have a reporter investigate.  Ask questions to see what is going on.  Maybe a simple 140 character post can turn into the top story of the day.
    • If a user on Twitter sees news happen, use that person who is there as it is happening in gathering information on a story.
  • Make Twitter an active part of the news broadcasts.  Reaction to a news story can be gauged even before the story is over on the broadcasts.  make the comments part of the story.

What I don't want to see is Twitter simply being used like RSS.  Twitter is a powerful tool that connects people together unlike Facebook likely ever will.  It should be used, and exploited to improve the quality of the news, and the quality of the media.  I believe that, if used properly, Twitter can be a tool to improve the quality of the product that the Media delivers.  I cannot wait to see what Lynda Steele and the rest of the Global TV Edmonton team can come up with.  As someone who has been using Twitter since November of 2007 it is very exciting to me to see how much it has grown.  I think the media can further it’s growth even more.

Welcome to the new thewunderbar.net

Hello, and welcome to version 3 of thewunderbar.net.  You probably don’t know that this is version 3, because the first two times I started blogging, no one read it and I just stopped doing it.  Why try a third time?  There are many reasons why.

The first 2 times I actually posted to this site, I got discouraged because I felt I needed to make the site stand out, and if I couldn't’ really do that, I lost the desire to keep going.  I first started thinking about what to do with my domain and hosting early in the new year, trying to figure out what to do with it.  I toyed with the idea of starting to use the site again, and was again trying to make it stand out amongst the internet crowd.  I finally just stopped and had to come to the realization that I can’t really make it stand out.  Sure, I could try, and in a lot of ways what I intend to do will be just a bit different, but I’m not going to try to make the site stand out anymore.  I’m going to post to it simply because I want to.  I figure that if I make the content compelling enough, the people will come.  Not everyone will be drawn to every post, but there should hopefully be enough variety for the people that visit.  If no one actually visits, oh well.  I’m going to keep posting anyway.

Speaking of posting, another thing about when I tried this site before, was that I felt like I had to post something almost every day.  Now, my full time job is not to write random things on the internet, so I’ve had to tell myself that it’s okay not to post every day.  I’ll try to post on a regular basis, but regular might end up being once every 10 days or so(or more!).  Basically I’ll post when I have some worthy content, instead of posting for the sake of it.

I’ve talked about the frequency of content, now it’s about the type of content.  I mentioned that I wouldn’t post unless I have something worth posting.  It’s the question I’ve struggled with the most during the time I’ve been working on creating this site.  Part of the reason why I let my previous attempts with this website die is because I felt like I didn’t do anything to make it stand out.  I’ve been thinking about ways to strike a balance.  I know that I probably can’t make this site stand out, but I do still want to put content up that people will actually want to take in.  I follow people like Leo Laporte, who makes a living off of making Podcasts, and being in the public eye, and iJustine, who has leveraged video on the internet probably better than anyone.  I also look at the Tom Merritt’s and Veronica Belmont’s of the world and see that they very much embrace being in the public eye.  I then also look at some of the other bloggers on the internet, from those that are local to me, like Mack D. Male, who runs www.mastermaq.ca.  I look at various news sites, which now have blogs of their own.  I’ve looked at successful blogs, and blogs that are less that successful.  The biggest successes seem to be the people who strike the perfect balance between a few key ideas, those being:

  • personality – The best blogs are from Authors who are not afraid to inject their own personality in, without getting too opinionated on said content.  It’s fine to criticize, but doing so in a constructive manner.
  • Type of content – Unless you are trying to be a tech news website, posting nothing but tech news will not get an audience. 
  • Variety – I’m not a fan of blogs that are just all walls of text, or just blogs of pictures, or just blogs with links to YouTube videos.  Blogs that only aggregate other content can also get annoying.

What will this blog be about?

Now that’s the big question isn’t it?  To tell you the truth, even after thinking about it, and writing this wall of text, I’m not 100% sure myself.  My last ill fated attempt had the tagline “the blog about everything I care about.”  This will likely be similar, but more refined.  I want to let the world, or whatever part of the world reads this site, know what I’m doing, what I’m thinking, and my opinion on things.  It is absolutely a personal blog, but I hope that I’ll also be posting content the reader wants to take in, not just the “hey, read about me” content.  I will be doing this through several mediums.

  • Writing
    • You’ll find posts like this one, although hopefully not as long, While I do plan to put out a variety of different types of content, sometimes the easiest way to get my thoughts out is to simply write them down.
  • News Stories + more
    • I don’t plan to do this often, but when a news story breaks that I really want to talk about, I’ll post a summary of the story, with a link, and then give my perspective.  I wont’ be doing this often, as if I wrote comments on even half the news stories I read every day, I’d never sleep, much less do anything else.
  • Photos
    • I enjoy taking photos.  I want to take more photos.  I will post photos to this website.  I’m going to try to avoid making posts that are just pictures, but I do hope they will become a bigger component of this site.  I hope that it will help give people my perspective in the world, to see what I am seeing.
  • Video
    • This is something that will not happen at launch.  I have recently purchased a Flip Mino HD, and I intend to start using it, along with the webcam on my PC, to create video content.  Some of this content will be me dictating what I would otherwise be writing as a typed post, other times I will be posting video of some of my experiences, like I will with photos.  I want to really play with the Mino HD and learn how to use it really well before I start doing this type of content, but I will look at putting this kind of content in by the end of April.

How will I make this content?  Well that’s simple.  I will be hosting the blog, and some of the content through my hosting service.  Many of the pictures I use will come from flickr, and the majority of the video will be through YouTube.  I basically will be working to leverage existing web 2.0 technologies, instead of trying to do my own thing.  I see no need to re-invent the wheel.

This post has ballooned into something much larger than I thought it would be, but I wanted to make a good explanation from the start.  It will be the first post of what I hope turns into many.

See you on the intertubes!

Tyler Hardeman

a.k.a. wunderbar.